Legal Opinion

Francois v. Mokrohisky

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1975No. 426PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

This is a medical malpractice case in which the jury found Drs. Boersma, Mokrohisky, and Stoll, negligent in the diagnosis of the illness of James Francois as gallstones and for the performance of subsequent surgery, which revealed a healthy gallbladder and no gallstones. Damages for loss of earnings, hospital and medical expenses, and for personal injury were awarded. The verdict was approved by the trial judge, and judgment was entered.

The question presented is whether a verdict for malpractice based on a res ipsa loquitur can be sustained in the absence of medical testimony establishing a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Shier v. FreedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Beaudoin v. Watertown Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Schuster v. AltenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Magdalene M. Smoot and Ryan M. Smoot v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. And Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Olfe v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ehlinger v. SipesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API