Legal Opinion

Beaudoin v. Watertown Memorial Hospital

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

In the trial court and here, the plaintiffs concede that without the benefit of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur the proof in the record is insufficient to warrant a finding of causal negligence against either of the defendants, the doctor or the hospital. The single issue before us is whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the benefit-of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Before discussing the issue it should be noted that the trial court granted the motion of both defendants for a nonsuit. In passing on a motion for nonsuit the court must construe the evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kuehnemann v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Lipsky v. C. Reiss Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Koehler v. Thiensville State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Wiles v. MyerlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Dalley v. Utah Valley Regional Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API