United States Fire Ins. v. Phil-Mar Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentITabt, J.
I am obliged to dissent from the majority opinion and the judgment in this case. I regret the length of this dissenting opinion but it seems necessary to express my viewpoint owing to the importance and intricacies of the problems.
The three parties — the lessor-insured, the lessee and the insurers — being circumstanced, legally related and interested in the implications of this action, let us take a look at the terms of the lease to which the lessor-insured and the lessee were parties to determine their intention and the expression of that intention in the lease itself.
The lease between Spang…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Illinois Automobile Insurance Exchange v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Powers v. CALVERT FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Carstens v. Western Pipe & Steel Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.