Carstens v. Western Pipe & Steel Co. of California
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
The lease which the plaintiffs gave the defendant, covering certain waterfront property in Seattle, contained this provision:
“At the expiration of the term hereof the said lessee [the defendant] will quit and surrender the said leased premises in as good state and condition as when possession is taken, damage by the elements or fire excepted.”
While the defendant was in possession, there was a somewhat disastrous fire which either destroyed or damaged some of the buildings located on the leased land and some of the derricks, cranes and other like property which were on the wharf and went with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Checkley v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Foley Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Van Wormer v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Brophy v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Sears, Roebuck and Company v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.