Legal Opinion
Nguyen v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1996No. A073553PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
This court issued an alternative writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 400 to review the trial court’s denial of Bic Van Nguyen et al.’s (Petitioners) motion to transfer the action to another county pursuant to section 394, subdivision (a), and section 397, subdivision (b). We find the District Attorney of San Mateo County represents the People of the State of California in a red light abatement action (Pen. Code, § 11226), exempting this action from the mandatory transfer provision of section 394, subdivision (a). We also find Petitioners did not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Clancy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Board of Supervisors v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pitts v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Arntz Builders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. N. River Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- GameStop, Inc. v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.