Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 1, 1946No. 3591PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

There was abundant evidence of the defendant’s negligence, and the entire emphasis of the defendant’s argument was directed to the contention that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The case has, therefore, been considered solely with reference to this question.

By Laws 1915, c. 148, the burden of proving contributory negligence in cases of personal injury is imposed upon the defendant. “Under the present law no evidence as to the care of the deceased is necessary as a part of a plaintiff’s case, and when his conduct is disclosed by the evidence a verdict can be directed for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. HustisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  2. Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. Folsom v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  4. Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  5. Morrison v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manseau v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  2. Rowe v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API