Minnesota Voters Alliance v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of the instant runoff voting (IRV) election methodology adopted by the City of Minneapolis for its municipal elections. Appellants Minnesota Voters Alliance, a nonprofit organization, and six Minneapolis voters contend that the IRV method violates their rights to vote, to associate for political purposes, and to equal protection under both the United States and the Minnesota Constitutions. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court ruled that IRV does not infringe on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dudum v. ArntzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Scott A. Kohlhaas, The Alaskan Independence Party, Robert M. Bird, and Kenneth P. Jacobus v. State of Alaska, Division of Elections Lieutenant Governor Kevin Meyer, in an Official Capacity and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an Official Capacity and Alaskans for Better Elections, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.