Legal Opinion
State v. Ness
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 2013No. Nos. A12-0290, A12-0291PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case involves two due process challenges to the face of Minn.Stat. § 629.75, subd. 1 (2012), which sets forth the process under which a domestic abuse no contact order may be issued to a defendant in a criminal proceeding. Pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 629.75, the district court issued domestic abuse no contact orders that prohibited appellant Bryan Paul Ness from contacting his wife. After Ness allegedly contacted his wife on multiple occasions, he was charged with two felony violations of Minn.Stat. § 629.75, subd. 2(d) (2012). Ness moved to dismiss both…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rita Ann Stevens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In re the Welfare of B.A.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Ryan Mark ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. David Ray BennettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne HenselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.