Legal Opinion

Dudum v. Arntz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2011No. 10-17198PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

In 1873, Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known by his pen name, Lewis Carroll, spotted what he took to be an “extraordinary injustice”: using simple plurality voting to determine the winners of elections. 1 Dodgson, celebrated for his whimsical classics Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass, was also a mathematician who developed election systems — meaning, simply, methods for translating preferences, or votes, into winners of elections. Dodgson disliked simple plurality voting because, in fields with several candidates, it can elect a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Arizona Libertarian Party v. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Emidio Soltysik v. Alex PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Public Integrity Alliance, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Michael Chamness v. Abel MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Election Integrity Project California, Inc. v. Shirley WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API