United States v. John P. Bewig
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
John P. Bewig appeals from his conviction for conspiring to distribute a list I chemical, pseudoephedrine, having reasonable cause to believe the listed chemical would be used to manufacture a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(c)(2). He raises numerous arguments, including insufficiency of evidence, improper admission of evidence, and that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. Alternatively, he argues that should his conviction stand, he was improperly sentenced.
For the reasons stated below, we affirm the conviction and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Leo Adams, United States of America v. Carl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Lonnie Weston, United States of America v. Sherry WoodardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rady I. Sdoulam, Also Known as Rady I. Sduolam, Also Known as Roddy Ibrahim, Also Known as Rady A. SdoulamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McGilberryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.