Legal Opinion

George v. . Smathers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOlarksoN, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled the motions and in this we can find no error. George v. Smathers, 196 N. C., 514.

The court below charged the jury as follows: “The law in this State is that where one adjoining owner constructs a party wall, one-half on his own land and one-half on the land of the adjoining owner, and the adjoining owner fails to contribute to tbe expense or tbe cost of tbe wall, after tbe wall bas been built by tbe party in question and tbe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Reid v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. George v. . SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferrell v. Durham Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API