Legal Opinion

George v. . Smathers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Tire controversy involves the alleged rights of the parties growing out of the construction and use of a party wall. The plaintiff brought suit to recover the sum of $513.92 as one-half the actual cost of the construction of the wall in question, and the defendants, denying certain material allegations of the complaint, pleaded a counterclaim to the plaintiff’s cause of action, the circumstances in reference to which are fully set forth in the further answer of the defendants. They pray that the plaintiff’s action be dismissed and that they recover of the plaintiff the sum of $1,500. The…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. George v. . SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API