Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-20-00047-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 James D. Noland, Jr., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Nonparties Jeffrey and Amber Wright (collectively, “the Wrights”) seek to quash a 15 subpoena pursuant to the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 (“RFPA”). (Doc. 234.) 16 For the following reasons, the motion will be denied. 17 BACKGROUND 18 The background of this case is set out more fully in the Court’s February 27, 2020 19 order. (Doc. 106.) In a nutshell, the FTC alleges that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re BlundenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995