Legal Opinion

Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 4, 2002No. 27, 2002PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, we hold that contracting parties who provide for the arbitration of disputes in their agreements need submit to arbitration only those claims that touch on the legal rights created by their contract. The Court of Chancery dismissed fiduciary duty claims brought by minority stockholders of a Delaware corporation on the ground that the transactions giving rise to the stockholders’ causes of action were also the factual basis for contract claims relating to the Underwriting Agreement through which they acquired their interests in the company. The Vice…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Feeley v. Nhaocg, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
  2. NAMA Holdings, LLC v. Related World Market Center, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
  3. Jackson v. Shakespeare Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. In re Wayport, Inc. LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API