Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Beeson Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1994No. S-5426PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this workers’ compensation appeal, Anthony Schmidt argues that a degenerative disc disorder in his neck and shoulder is a result of heavy lifting while he was employed with Beeson Plumbing & Heating, Inc. (Bee-son). The Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (the Board) denied his claim, on the ground that his employment with Beeson was not the cause of his condition. Schmidt argues that Beeson’s workers’ compensation carriers waived certain defenses, that his second hearing before the Board violated due process, and that the Board improperly appointed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cooper v. State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Milne v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Consumer Protection Division v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Beilgard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dickinson v. American Medical ResponseNevada Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API