Legal Opinion

Wirth v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2014PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

In this direct appeal, we examine a decision by the Commonwealth Court, sitting en banc, which considered the application of Pennsylvania personal income tax (PIT) to various nonresidents, who invested as limited partners in a Connecticut limited partnership, which existed for the sole purpose of owning and operating a skyscraper in the City of Pittsburgh, which ultimately went into foreclosure in 2005. The Commonwealth Court held that the partnership was subject to PIT commensurate with the total debt discharged as a result of the foreclosure, and therefore the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. Cousar, B., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Banfield, Aplts. v. Secretary of the ComSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. WiseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API