Harley Davidson v. Workforce Appeals Board of the Utah Department of Workforce Services
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
¶ 1 Harley Davidson challenges the court of appeals’s dismissal of its petition for review of a decision rendered by the Workforce Appeals Board. The petition for review contained several flaws and was not filed with the appropriate filing fee. The court of appeals dismissed the petition for review, citing a lack of jurisdiction, since a corrected petition filed three days later and accompanied by a fee was untimely. Harley Davidson asks us to review (1) whether the court of appeals was correct in dismissing its petition, and (2) whether the “notice of appeal” was effective…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gorostieta v. ParkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GarnerUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Cedar Surgery Center, L.L.C. v. BonelliUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Leonczynski v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL COMM.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- Hausknect v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. Central Utah Counseling CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Blauer v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Blauer v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005