Legal Opinion
Hausknect v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided September 21, 1994No. 930768-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
Stephen E. Hauskneet petitions for relief from a final order of the Industrial Commission (Commission) dismissing his claim of age discrimination against Kennecott Corporation (Kennecott). Petitioner did not timely pay the required fees in connection with his petition for review; therefore, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
The relevant procedural facts are as follows. On November 4, 1993, the Commission issued a final order denying Hauskneet an evidentiary hearing with respect to his claim of age discrimination. Pursuant to Rule 14(a) of the Utah Rules of Appellate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Avco Financial Services v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Prowswood, Inc. v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dipoma v. McPhieUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Harley Davidson v. Workforce Appeals Board of the Utah Department of Workforce ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Dipoma v. McPhieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000