Legal Opinion

State v. Garner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2005No. 20030406PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 Petitioner Kelly Garner seeks review of the court of appeals' dismissal of his case for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Garner argues that modifications to the original trial court judgment extended the appeals period, and that the court of appeals therefore erred in dismissing his appeal as untimely. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 This case arises from a judgment entered against Garner on July 26, 2001, following his conditional plea 1 to one count each of criminal mischief and burglary. The trial court sentenced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. State v. DeanUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Snyder v. Murray City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Manning v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. All Real Property, Residence & AppurtenancesUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  5. Anderson v. Wilshire Investments, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API