Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Sabine River Authority of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 24, 2003No. 06-02-00128-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACK CARTER, Justice.

After a jury trial, the trial court held that Sabine River Authority (Sabine) met the jurisdictional prerequisites necessary for bringing a condemnation proceeding. On appeal, the landowners, Hollis and Sandra Pitts, bring the following points of error: (1) the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that Sabine made a bona fide offer to purchase the same easement it sought to condemn; (2) the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that Sabine complied with Tex. PROp.Code…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Crown Life Insurance Company v. CasteelTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. ReynaTexas Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moore v. Kitsmiller, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  2. Texas Ear Nose & Throat Consultants, PLLC, Joseph Edmonds, Newton Duncan and James Albright v. John K. Jones M.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Andrea Collie v. IBEX Staffing Solutions, Inc. and Pronto General Agency, Ltd. D/B/A Pronto Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  4. Andrew L. Neloms, Jr. v. BNSF Railway Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. Andrew L. Neloms, Jr. v. BNSF Railway Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API