Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 9, 1996No. Nos. 95SC354, 95SC479PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

In these consolidated appeals we granted certiorari1 before judgment, pursuant to C.A.R. 50, to review orders of the district courts for Douglas and Boulder Counties granting motions for summary judgment invalidating new development school impact fees. Both courts concluded that the County Commissioners lacked authority, beyond the statutorily prescribed exaction for school purposes, to require an additional payment for the benefit of school districts. Both courts ruled that the state had preempted the arena of public school finance; in addition, the Boulder County District Court con-*695eluded…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. A.B. Hirschfeld Press, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Colorado Ground Water Commission v. Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Krupp v. Breckenridge Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Department of Transportation v. City of Idaho SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API