Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. McClure

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1893No. 16,464PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This case is here for the second time. See Bunting v. Gilmore, 124 Ind. 113.

The action was originally brought on the 22d day of August, 1887, by Samuel A. Bunting, now deceased. The purpose of the suit was to have the plaintiff subrogated to the rights of" certain judgment creditors of William Gilmore and Robert L. Gilmore, whose judgment claims he had paid. 'X'he appellant William R. Gilmore is a son of the said William Gilmore, and a brother of the said Robert L. Gilmore. The said judgments had been paid by Samuel A. Bunting, under a written agreement made by him with Robert L. Gilmore, who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Ulrich v. DrischellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Craighead v. DaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Elwood v. BeymerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Kurtz v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Eckert v. BinkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. StuckwishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Walb v. EshelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API