Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Carr

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1886No. 12,267PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Howk, J. —

This was a verified claim filed by the appellant, Kurtz, in the clerk’s office of the White Circuit Court, against the appellee Carr, administrator de bonis non of the *575estate of Benjamin D. Pettit, deceased. Afterwards, such claim not having been allowed by the appellee at the time prescribed by law, it was duly transferred to the issue docket of the White Circuit Court for trial; and thereupon, on appellant’s application, the venue of the cause was changed to the court below. There, the parties appeared, and appellant filed a second paragraph of his verified claim. The- cause being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Cruzan v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Richardson v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Robinson v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Fairbanks v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gray v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Blair v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Kehr v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Breeze v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API