Legal Opinion

Aloysius Roberts, Libellant-Appellant-Appellee v. S.S. Argentina and Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., Respondents-Appellees-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 26, 1966No. 332, Docket 29499PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Libellant commenced this action for maintenance and cure. The case came on before Judge Croake in the Southern District of New York who decided it on the basis of an agreed statement of facts. The libellant was awarded $320, but his claim for counsel fees was denied. Both parties have appealed. The libellant claims that he is entitled to counsel fees within the rule of Vaughan v. Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 82 S.Ct. 997, 8 L.Ed.2d 88 (1962), and the respondents appeal from the award of maintenance and cure. We affirm in all respects.

After reviewing the brief record, we conclude that the award for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Diaz v. Gulf Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Jordan v. Norfolk Dredging CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963
  4. Vaughan v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1962
  5. Connorton v. Harbor Towing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Anthony P. Kraljic v. Berman Enterprises, Inc., and General Marine Transport Corp., Berman Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Joseph Incandela v. American Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Hudspeth v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  4. Rodriguez Alvarez v. Bahama Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Duplantis v. Williams-McWilliams Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API