Legal Opinion

Duplantis v. Williams-McWilliams Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 18, 1969No. Civ. A. 68-947PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO MAINTENANCE AND CURE

CASSIBRY, District Judge:

This is a seaman’s action for damages under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and the general maritime law by the pile-driver foreman and member of the crew of the defendant’s barge, Piledriver No. 45. Claim is also made for maintenance at the rate of $8.00 per day. The defendant, who has been voluntarily paying maintenance of $6.00 per day, has refused the plaintiff’s demand for an increased payment. By way of this motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff now seeks to increase maintenance to the $8.00 per day…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Field v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Hudspeth v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  5. Aloysius Roberts, Libellant-Appellant-Appellee v. S.S. Argentina and Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., Respondents-Appellees-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. George Barnes v. Andover Company, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Richard Tate v. American Tugs, Inc. And Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Hall v. Noble Drilling (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Robinson v. Plimsoll Marine, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
  5. Billiot v. Toups Marine Transport, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API