Legal Opinion

Bolden v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 8, 1983No. 82-1853PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss their second amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The issue presented on appeal is whether plaintiffs’ second amended complaint failed to state a cause of action in promissory estoppel.

Plaintiffs, injured in a multi-car collision on June 20, 1979, filed an unverified complaint on December 28, 1979, which alleged that they were beneficiaries of an agreement between Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna) and defendant General Accident, Fire and Life Assurance Corporation (General), insurers of two…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Burgess v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Levitt Homes, Inc. v. Old Farm Homeowners' Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Burdin v. Jefferson Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Derby Meadows Utility Co. v. Inter-Continental Real EstateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Quake Construction, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Pudil v. Smart Buy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Verdeyen v. Board of Education of Batavia Public School District No. 101Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Torres v. Amoco Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API