Legal Opinion

In re Plume for Leave to Prove Exceptions

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1899No. 1,415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On the application of D. J. Plume for leave to prove exceptions.

1Per curiam

— Original proceeding. The petitioner makes application to this court for leave to prove before a referee, or by deposition, the facts in relation to a statement of the ease on motion for a new trial. The application is made under Section 1157 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Subdivision lé of Rule IV of this court.

*42The petition discloses that a judgment of nonsuit was entered against the plaintiff (petitioner) on the 15th day of February, 1898; that thereafter plaintiff duly filed and served a notice of his intention to move for a new trial of the-cause; that subsequently he served a draft…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Flagg v. PuterbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. BitancourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Brown v. PrewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Watts v. Billings Bench Water Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hansen v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Harding v. McLaughlinMontana Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API