In re Plume for Leave to Prove Exceptions
Montana Supreme Court
On the application of D. J. Plume for leave to prove exceptions.
1Per curiam
— Original proceeding. The petitioner makes application to this court for leave to prove before a referee, or by deposition, the facts in relation to a statement of the ease on motion for a new trial. The application is made under Section 1157 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Subdivision lé of Rule IV of this court.
*42The petition discloses that a judgment of nonsuit was entered against the plaintiff (petitioner) on the 15th day of February, 1898; that thereafter plaintiff duly filed and served a notice of his intention to move for a new trial of the-cause; that subsequently he served a draft…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Flagg v. PuterbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. BitancourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Brown v. PrewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- Watts v. Billings Bench Water Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Hansen v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Harding v. McLaughlinMontana Supreme Court · 1899