Flagg v. Puterbaugh
California Supreme Court
Hearing in the Supreme Court upon a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County to settle and certify a bill of exceptions. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
— This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the respondent to settle and certify a bill of exceptions to an order dissolving a writ of attachment. Despondent demurs generally to the petition for want of facts. From the petition it appears that the order dissolving the attachment was made October 4, 1892. Afterwards, on the same day, the cause in which the attachment had been issued was tried by the court and taken under advisement. On October 7th judgment was directed for the plaintiff, and on October 13th findings were filed and judgment entered. On October 8th petitioner (plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ansco Construction Co. v. Ocean View Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Perrin v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Apple v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Wall v. MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Gutierrez v. HebberdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.