People v. Bitancourt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
In this case there is a preliminary matter as to the bill of exceptions, concerning which the facts are as follows: —
The proposed bill was presented to the judge of the court below on June 6, 1887. On June 7th the appellant’s counsel filed a verified petition, stating the presentation of the proposed bill, and that the judge “ refuses to allow certain exceptions of said defendant,” *189and praying for leave to make proof of said exceptions. Upon this petition an order was made on the same day referring the bill to the Hon. William T. Wallace for settlement.
On June 15'th the appellant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. Smith v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. Lee Lin Tai v. HewillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. NunleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Rinaldo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- In re Plume for Leave to Prove ExceptionsMontana Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.