Protect Our Water v. County of Merced
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DIBIASO, J.
In March 2001, appellants Protect Our Water, San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center, and Merced Valley River Association (collectively POW), filed a petition for writ of mandamus setting aside a conditional use permit issued by respondent County of Merced (County). The permit allowed real party in interest Calaveras Materials, Inc. (CMI), to conduct surface mining operations (project) at a site known as Woolstenhulme Ranch. The petition also sought mandamus setting aside the certification of the environmental impact report (EIR) for the project and alleged that County had violated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Robinson v. City of ChowchillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast RegionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Riverwatch v. County of San Diego Department of Environmental HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.