Legal Opinion
Robinson v. City of Chowchilla
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 2011No. F060571PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAWSON, J.
Plaintiff appeals from (1) an order denying him attorney fees under California’s private attorney general doctrine, which is set forth in Code *387of Civil Procedure section 1021.51 and (2) an order applying section 998 to limit his recovery of costs to those incurred prior to defendants’ May 7, 2007, offer to compromise.
We conclude that this litigation, which resulted in a published decision regarding the meaning and application of Government Code section 3304, subdivision (c) (Robinson v. City of Chowchilla (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 368 [134 Cal.Rptr.3d 687]), enforced an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Olson v. Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Hewlett v. Squaw Valley Ski Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Collins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Summit Media, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Investco Mgmt. & Dev. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bui v. Trang Kim NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.