Woodcock v. McQueen
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit to recover the value of personal property. Answer in two paragraphs — 1. General denial. 2. That the property was sold by the plaintiff to the defendant under an agreement that, if Morton should be elected governor at, &c., the defendant should pay to the plaintiff double the value of the property; but if Willard should be elected, nothing was to be paid, &c.
The Court overruled a demurrer to this paragraph; and, for want of further reply thereto, gave judgment for the defendant. Proper exceptions were taken.
The contract set up in the answer was illegal and void. It was a wagering…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- M'Hatton v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
- Duncan v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Comer v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Ex Parte WalshCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Lassen v. KarrerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Boyce v. O'Dell Commission Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.