Legal Opinion

Woodcock v. McQueen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1858PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit to recover the value of personal property. Answer in two paragraphs — 1. General denial. 2. That the property was sold by the plaintiff to the defendant under an agreement that, if Morton should be elected governor at, &c., the defendant should pay to the plaintiff double the value of the property; but if Willard should be elected, nothing was to be paid, &c.

The Court overruled a demurrer to this paragraph; and, for want of further reply thereto, gave judgment for the defendant. Proper exceptions were taken.

The contract set up in the answer was illegal and void. It was a wagering…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M'Hatton v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Duncan v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Comer v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Ex Parte WalshCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Lassen v. KarrerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Boyce v. O'Dell Commission Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API