Legal Opinion

Lassen v. Karrer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Vance, J. Assumpsit by Peter Lassen against Benjamin J. Karrer to recover money lost on an election bet. From a , judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought to recover $500, lost to defendant by plaintiff by betting on the result of an election. At the common law, one who lost money in prohibited gaming or betting could not recover, the rule, in the absence of statute, being that the law will leave the parties in pari delicto where it finds them. This has been so universally held that it is not necessary to support the proposition by authority. In fact, the doctrine is not controverted in this case; but the plaintiff contends — and the circuit judge sustained the contention —that the plaintiff had a right of action by our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodcock v. McQueenIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Ex Parte MuckenfussCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. People v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. National Recovery System v. KasleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. Hurt v. Oak Downs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API