Legal Opinion

M'Hatton v. Bates

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.

H. and D. Bates brought suit against M’Hat-ton before a justice of the peace on an account. The defendant filed the following defence: H. Bates & Co., to Robert M’Hatton, Dr. To debt of honour, Presidential election, 16 dollars. The case was tried before the justice and a judgment rendered on the verdict in favour of the defendant. The plaintiffs appealed to the Circuit Court and the cause was submitted to the Court, without the intervention of a jury, and judgment given in favour of the plaintiffs.

The only material question which the case presents, arises from an exception taken by the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Woodcock v. McQueenIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Thrift v. RedmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. Boyce v. O'Dell Commission Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901
  5. State v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API