Legal Opinion

Boyce v. O'Dell Commission Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided July 17, 1901No. 9,910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

This is an action at law, brought by the plaintiff, James Boyce, against the defendant, the O'Dell Commission Company, for the recovery of divers sums of money, amounting in the aggregate to $3,449.14, alleged to have been lost and paid on a certain game, commonly called a “bucket-shop game,” in futures, options, and margins. The amended complaint, so far as material, is as follows:

“That each of said sums had and received by defendant was paid and delivered by plaintiff to defendant within six months immediately preceding the commencement of the original suit under which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Shaw v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. David Dows, Jr. & Co. v. GlaspelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Third Nat. Bank v. HarrisonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
  5. Woodcock v. McQueenIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ives v. BoyceNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Carpenter v. Beal-McDonnell & Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1915
  3. Lancaster v. McKinleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API