Legal Opinion

Sampson v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 19, 2000No. 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

In Zimmerman v. State, 78 Md.App. 1, 552 A.2d 47 (1989), after explaining why the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine required that this Court reverse the conviction of a defendant whose culpability had been established “beyond question,” Chief Judge Gilbert reiterated

what Judge Moylan wrote in The Right of People to Be Secure, National College of District Attorneys (1976):

Frequently, a police officer, in a reflective mood, will say, “Judge, you know this 4th Amendment makes my job a lot tougher and more difficult.” What does one respond, except to say:

“Officer, that’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API