Sampson v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
In Zimmerman v. State, 78 Md.App. 1, 552 A.2d 47 (1989), after explaining why the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine required that this Court reverse the conviction of a defendant whose culpability had been established “beyond question,” Chief Judge Gilbert reiterated
what Judge Moylan wrote in The Right of People to Be Secure, National College of District Attorneys (1976):
Frequently, a police officer, in a reflective mood, will say, “Judge, you know this 4th Amendment makes my job a lot tougher and more difficult.” What does one respond, except to say:
“Officer, that’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001