Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Sampson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 16, 2001No. 17, Sept. Term, 2000Published

1DissentRaker, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Because I believe that this Court’s extension of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 108 S.Ct. 1625, 100 *453L.Ed.2d 30 (1988), to a situation in which law enforcement officers trespass onto private property to remove garbage from within the curtilage6 of Respondent’s home is both unnecessary and unwise, I would affirm the decision of the Court of Special Appeals. To quote Chief Judge Posner, in his dissent in United States v. Redmon, 138 F.3d 1109, 1129 (7th Cir.1998), “[t]he better answer would be that searches, including…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Everhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API