Legal Opinion
SSM Associates Limited Partnership v. Plan & Zoning Commission of Fairfield
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 16, 1988No. 6032PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendants1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court issuing a writ of mandamus requiring them to issue a certificate of zoning compliance to the plaintiffs2 for construction of an office building. The dispositive issue involves the meaning of the term “site plan” as used in General Statutes § 8-3 (g).3 We find no error.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. The named plaintiff had an agreement to purchase from the other plaintiff the property in question, consisting of approximately 4.25 acres located in a designated research district (DRD) established pursuant to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- East Side Civic Assn. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Carr v. WoolwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barberino Realty & Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- SSM Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Smith-Groh, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission of GreenwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.