Legal Opinion

Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 2, 1997No. AC 16526; AC 16528PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, J.

The defendants, Torrington planning and zoning commission (commission) and Torrington Land Associates, Inc. (TLA), appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiff, Connecticut Resources Recoveiy Authority’s (CRRA), appeal from the granting of a special exception in favor of TLA. On appeal, the defendants contend that the trial court improperly found that the subject premises constituted a flag lot1 and, therefore, did not conform with Torring-ton’s zoning regulations.

*568The following facts and procedural history are necessary for disposition of this appeal.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Barberino Realty & Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Allied Plywood, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  5. Whisper Wind Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Raymond v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Raczkowski v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Wiltzius v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Bethlehem Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API