Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Harwood

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The following four issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Was there a cause of action in favor of the estate of decedent, Emily Dahl, which required abatement of the instant action until the two causes of action could be consolidated ?(2) Was there a duplication of negligence in submitting issues of negligence on the part of-the defendant James?(3) Was plaintiff negligent as a matter of law in operating a motor vehicle on the highway during the hours of darkness without a taillight ?(4) Was the combined negligence of plaintiff and his deceased wife, as a matter of law, equal to, or greater…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wuesthoff v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hephner v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Marchant v. FranzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Mainz v. LundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bavarian Soccer Club, Inc. v. PiersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. After Hour Welding, Inc. v. Laneil Management Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API