After Hour Welding, Inc. v. Laneil Management Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDecker, C.J.
Did the trial court err in denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial due to alleged misconduct of the jury? We conclude that the issue is governed by sec. 906.06(2), Stats., and that neither the affidavit nor the hearing conducted by the trial court satisfy the public policy requirements of the statute. We affirm.
A jury trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff against the defendant corporations. Sydney Eisenberg was an officer of the defendant corporations and testi fied at trial. Before motions after verdict, defendants moved for a new trial claiming jury misconduct. The motion was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Beaumont Gereau, in Nos. 74-2019, 74-2020, 74-2021, 74-2022,74-2023Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States of America Ex Rel. Craig S. Owen v. Hon. Daniel J. McMann Warden of Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. OttCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Fantin v. MahnkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983