Mainz v. Lund
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The issues presented on this appeal are:(1) Was defendant Lund causally negligent as a matter of law ?(2) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in its instructions to the jury?(3) Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?
Negligence Issue.
Defendant Lund at the time of the accident was twenty-six years of age and employed as a manufacturing engineer by the Trane Company at its La Crosse plant. He left the Trane Company plant on the day of the accident at about 4:45 p. m. and got into his 1956 four-door Oldsmobile sedan to drive home. He had with him three fellow…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Braatz v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Steffes v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Dahl v. HarwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by26 opinions
- Keplin v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Dahl v. K-MARTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.