Legal Opinion

Uslan v. Woronoff

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 8, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFasso, J.

This is a motion to vacate the special appearance of the defendant. The action, brought by residents of the city of New Rochelle, is for damages arising out of a collision which occurred in the State of New York between two motor vehicles. At the time of the accident the defendant operated an automobile which bore Pennsylvania license plates and gave his address as 123 South Thirty-ninth street, Philadelphia, Pa. The affidavit submitted by the defendant upon this motion reveals, however., that he is permanently domiciled in the city of Mount Vernon and that he is absent from the State of New…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. De Meli v. . De MeliNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Frost & Dickinson v. BrisbinNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Haggart v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  5. Rawstorne v. MaguireNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Hughes v. LuckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Clark v. ReichmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. Colon v. Pennsylvania Greyhound LinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Sease v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API