Legal Opinion
Sease v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHalpern, J.
Under the circumstances of this case, we believe that it was proper to serve the defendant by mail pursuant to the provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
The plaintiff was allegedly injured on August 1, 1948, as the result of a collision between an automobile in which she was a passenger and an omnibus owned and operated by the defendant, on a State highway in Chemung County.
The plaintiff did not retain an attorney until May of 1951, about three months before the Statute of Limitations would have run against her cause of action. The plaintiff’s attorney in an effort to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Reese v. ReamoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Shuba v. GreendonnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Angerosa v. White CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brandes Meat Corp. v. CromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Corning v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK COMPANY v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Hudson Institute, Inc. v. CerneseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972