Bummer v. Liberty Laundry Co.

Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff (respondent), the essential facts are:

On November 26, 1938, plaintiff was employed as “floor lady” in defendant’s laundry. She had been working for defendant for seven or eight months prior to November 26, 1938. Some time prior to the accident Mr. Wilde, foreman for defendant, informed plaintiff that the opening time had been changed from 7:00 a. m. to 6:00 a. m., at which…