Legal Opinion
Duclos v. Tashjian
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1939No. Civ. 2252PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
A judgment was rendered against defendants in the sum of $15,330.69 as damages for the death of Cuprien Duclos in a collision between two automobiles being driven by defendants. Duclos was the husband of Daisy A. Duclos and the father of Rose A. Brim and Edith J. Hurlbert. The defendants took separate appeals.
Defendant S. Tashjian presents the following grounds for reversal of the judgment against him: That Duclos was a guest and not a passenger in Tashjian’s automobile at the time of the fatal accident; prejudicial error in instructions given the jury; prejudicial error in refusing an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fussner v. AndertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Benwell v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.