Legal Opinion

Fairman v. Mors

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1942No. Civ. 13733PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The question for decision in this case is whether, in the absence of an allegation either (1) of facts showing that he was a passenger for hire or (2) of facts amounting to wilful misconduct or intoxication, a complaint for personal injuries received by an occupant of an automobile owned and operated by another states a cause of action.

After a demurrer to plaintiff’s original complaint had been sustained, his amended complaint stated substantially as follows : that in June, 1941, “defendant was driving, operating, managing, and controlling” a sedan automobile on a business highway; that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bosse v. MaryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Smith v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. Kelley (1937)California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Bummer v. Liberty Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Estate of MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. De Falla v. TuttleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Security FirstNational Bank of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API