Fairman v. Mors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for decision in this case is whether, in the absence of an allegation either (1) of facts showing that he was a passenger for hire or (2) of facts amounting to wilful misconduct or intoxication, a complaint for personal injuries received by an occupant of an automobile owned and operated by another states a cause of action.
After a demurrer to plaintiff’s original complaint had been sustained, his amended complaint stated substantially as follows : that in June, 1941, “defendant was driving, operating, managing, and controlling” a sedan automobile on a business highway; that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bosse v. MaryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Smith v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. Kelley (1937)California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Bummer v. Liberty Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hatch v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- De Falla v. TuttleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Security FirstNational Bank of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.