Legal Opinion
Bank of America, FSB v. Doumani
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 26, 2007No. 2006-5088, 2006-5089, 2006-5090PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER, in which District Judge GARBIS joins. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
RADER, Circuit Judge.
In this case arising from the Winstar ruling, United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996), the United States Court of Federal Claims made a variety of holdings. In particular, the trial court held that the Bank of America (BoA) filed its complaint within the statute of limitations, that Messrs. Doumani and Thrall were not parties to a contract with the Government, that the plaintiffs deserved no…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Lasalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Mola Development Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Chapman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.