Legal Opinion

Developers Diversified Ltd. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998No. 97-2329PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

R.C. 5715.19(A)(2) provides:

“As used in division (A)(2) of this section, ‘interim period’ means, for each county, the tax year to which section 5715.24 of the Revised Code applies and each subsequent tax year until the tax year in which that section applies again.
“No person, board, or officer shall file a complaint against the valuation or assessment of any parcel that appears on the tax list if it filed a complaint against the valuation or assessment of that parcel for any prior tax year in the same interim period, unless the person, board, or officer alleges that the valuation or assessment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanjim Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Park Ridge Co. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Columbia Toledo Corp. v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mellon Bank, NA v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Apple Group, Ltd. v. Granger Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Colvin v. Summit Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. NDHMD, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Developers Diversified Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gallick v. Franklin Cty. Bd of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API