Apple Group, Ltd. v. Granger Township Board of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} This zoning case involves the interpretation of a single statutory phrase. We are asked to determine whether R.C. 519.02 requires a township to adopt a “comprehensive plan” separately from its zoning resolution. We hold that a comprehensive plan pursuant to R.C. 519.02 may be included within a township’s zoning resolution and need not be a separate and distinct document. Furthermore, a zoning resolution is enacted in accordance with a comprehensive plan, as required by R.C. 519.02, if it (1) reflects current land uses, (2) allows for change, (3) promotes public health and safety, (4)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FutrallOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
- State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LoveOhio Supreme Court · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Willow Grove v. Olmstead Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Verbillion v. Enon Sand & Gravel, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State ex rel. Twitchell v. Saferin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Columbus Bituminous Concrete Corp. v. Harrison Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Mantua Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. KukralOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.