Legal Opinion

Apple Group, Ltd. v. Granger Township Board of Zoning Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2015No. 2014-0301PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This zoning case involves the interpretation of a single statutory phrase. We are asked to determine whether R.C. 519.02 requires a township to adopt a “comprehensive plan” separately from its zoning resolution. We hold that a comprehensive plan pursuant to R.C. 519.02 may be included within a township’s zoning resolution and need not be a separate and distinct document. Furthermore, a zoning resolution is enacted in accordance with a comprehensive plan, as required by R.C. 519.02, if it (1) reflects current land uses, (2) allows for change, (3) promotes public health and safety, (4)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. FutrallOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. LoveOhio Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willow Grove v. Olmstead Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Verbillion v. Enon Sand & Gravel, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Twitchell v. Saferin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Columbus Bituminous Concrete Corp. v. Harrison Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Mantua Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. KukralOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API